Taylor Swift, known for her strong feminist stance and songs like “The Man,” has sparked a heated debate following an article by conservative journalist John Mac Ghlionn. In his controversial piece for Newsweek titled “Taylor Swift Is Not a Good Role Model,” Ghlionn criticized the pop star, whose Eras Tour is the highest-grossing concert tour of all time, for being a negative influence on young girls.
Ghlionn’s article suggested that Swift, at 34 years old and without a husband or children, is setting a poor example for young girls. He contrasted this with her boyfriend, Travis Kelce, who is the same age and also unmarried, but did not face similar criticism in the piece. This glaring double standard immediately drew backlash.
The journalist’s intention was to “offer some pushback” against the widespread adoration for Swift, but his views were quickly labeled as outdated and misogynistic. Ghlionn argued that despite Swift’s success in sparking conversations and generating profits, her personal life choices make her an unsuitable role model. He contended that young girls should aspire to more “wholesome” romantic lifestyles, critiquing Swift’s past relationships.
His argument that any loving parent would not want their daughter to date multiple men in a short period was particularly controversial. Ghlionn’s focus on Swift’s marital status and childlessness, while ignoring similar aspects of Kelce’s life, did not go unnoticed. Many readers took to social media to express their outrage.
Furious responses poured in, with users branding Ghlionn an “incel misogynist coward.” One Twitter user exclaimed, “What the actual f*** is this misogynistic claptrap from @Newsweek?! Taylor Swift isn’t a role model because she’s ‘unmarried and childless’? What the hell?” Another pointed out the double standard, noting that men are never chastised for being unmarried and childless at 34.
Supporters of Swift highlighted her work ethic, financial independence, and charitable contributions, arguing that these qualities make her a positive role model. One user wrote, “Young girls do not need to aspire to marriage and children. There are worse role models than someone who evidently works hard and is financially independent and also made huge donations towards food banks.”
While the majority condemned Ghlionn’s views, some users agreed with his perspective. One comment read, “It is a point of view. Everyone is allowed to have one. I wouldn’t want a daughter seeking out hollow fame personally.” Another added, “Personally, I absolutely love how triggered all the woke feminazis are by this. If there’s nothing wrong with being unmarried and childless, what are you all so angry about?”
Ghlionn’s article and the subsequent backlash underscore ongoing societal debates about gender roles and the expectations placed on women, particularly in the public eye. The controversy highlights the persistent double standards in how society views the personal lives of successful women compared to their male counterparts.
Despite the criticism, some believe that Ghlionn’s article opened an important dialogue. However, the overwhelming response suggests that many are not ready to accept such traditional views on women’s roles in society. Ghlionn has since deleted his X account, and both Newsweek and Ghlionn have been contacted for comment.